toronto

Ramen in Toronto

Tuesday, January 22nd, 2013

Continuing on my Ramen kick I have visited several ramen shops in Toronto and decided to provide my assessments.

1. Kenzo Ramen – Kenzo is one of the earliest ramen shops in the city and I’ve been to Kenzo several time and at several locations.  Personally, I prefer the one on Yonge street North of Finch ave. It’s a little smaller and feels more like a Japanese ramen shop to me.

takoyaki-14 Kenzo’s ramen is standard.  Not mind-blowing but not terrible either. The noodles are a good consistency but the broth lacks kick.  It’s salty but there is no subtlety in the flavours or nuances that make you think of other Japanese delights. That being said with two new locations they obviously have appeal.

What Kenzo does have, I am pleased to say, is takoyaki (octopus balls).  The takoyaki at Kenzo is easily comparable to anything in Japan.  My only criticism is the minimal bento flakes, although that is probably to appeal to a Western market. Kenzo also has the best gyoza in the city hands-down.  I am pretty sure they make the dumplings themselves and unlike many “Japanese” restaurants they do not deep-fry them.  The gyoza are pan-fried and then steamed so they are like pot-stickers, which is the way proper gyoza are supposed to be made.

2. Santouka Hokkaido Ramen - Santouka is one of the better Ramen shops in the city.  I have been here twice and enjoyed the Shoyu Ramen both times. Their noodles are great, chewy and have a delightful flavour. The cha-shu, pork meat, was very well done and melted in my mouth.  I found the broth to be a bit salty but it’s cold outside so I can’t complain too much. What I can complain about though is the serving size and the wait. While I can excuse the wait, that comes from being relatively new and near the Dundas area. Hopefully over time this will die down and you will not have to stand in the cold for an hour any more.

The one issue I cannot excuse is the size.  Ramen is supposed to be a meal that fills you up.  If I am still hungry after Ramen, there is an issue.  The funny thing is I would argue that Santouka has some of the best toppings, fermented bamboo shoots (washed so they’re mild), jelly ear mushrooms, fish cake and spring onions  which are great accompaniment to the noodles. There just isn’t enough noodles.

2013-01-20 18.31.133. Kinton Ramen – I went to Kinton last night and I was impressed and disappointed at the same time. I was impressed with cha-shu (pork belly) and the karaage but I was disappointed with the noodles and the broth. I will start with the good. The pork was grilled with a torch. Let me repeat that. The pork was grilled with a kitchen torch. Everything that is good about braising meat with the tasty addition of barbecue!  The flavour of the meat was excellent and something I will adopt in my own Ramen. However, I ended up overdoing the whole pork thing as I had ordered the sho-yu ramen plus the additional shoulder pork; so my advice is take it easy on the pork.  The other good thing was the chicken karaage, which was almost on par with the chicken my husband makes (he makes orgasmic chicken karaage). Big chunks of chicken, a creamy tartar-esque sauce piping hot without being oily or fatty.

I am not sure if the brilliant meat and chicken offset the ramen in a negative way, but I found the noodles to be more like Chinese noodles than  ramen noodles.  They were not as chewy as they should have been and were almost hard. The broth was in comparison to the pork and chicken was bland and tasteless.  It lacked any aromatics. From my own experimentation, I expect there to be hints of onion, ginger, garlic and even a waft of wasabi in broth.  This soup lacked that.  The broth should be able to stand on it’s own as a soup.   Despite these negatives, Kinton was priced well and the servings were a good size.

4. Momofuku Ramen - This is ramen for rich people.  I have been here several times because it is close to work, and each time been disappointed but for different reasons.  The first time I went, I was early because I wanted to beat the lunch rush. I was there two minutes before they open and the girl just shook her head through the glass door at me, rather than letting me sit down and read the menu she was going to make me stand there until the official opening time.  I just left.  Clearly I was not going to line up for an empty restaurant.

The second time I went I actually made it in, but went right after work to beat the dinner rush.  I ordered the Ramen and the Seven Spice Sour Slushie which in my opinion was awful.  The slushie, not the ramen.  The ramen at Momofuku is what I would consider the fundamental ramen.  It has broth, noodles, pork, onion, nori, fish cake, egg and bamboo shoots. At $14 for the bowl it was a bit pricey for my taste, but the whole package is overall satisfying.  I left full which is great, but the sticker shock after tax and tip was a bit much.

The third time I went the ramen didn’t seem the same as when I went the first time.  I know there cannot be progress without deviation from the norm, but I had brought people to try the Momofuku ramen and it wasn’t the same as the first time I had it.

sesame_seed_grinder5. Sansoutei Ramen - Hands down the best ramen I have had in Toronto. Similar to Kinton the cha-shu is twice cooked, although rather than torched it is grilled, enhancing the flavour which is a nice touch. The Tonkotsu broth was rich and creamy with a deep pork flavour.  Over the pork flavour there is hints of other flavour including what I believe to be wasabi. The noodles are chewy like good ramen should be and it comes with eggs and wood ear.

If I had one complaint (and it goes for all the ramen in Toronto) it would be the lack of sesame.  One of the more delightful features of Japanese ramen is that there is a jar of roasted sesame which you grind with a handle. I would like that to be an option at restaurants.

Share

So now what?

Tuesday, November 27th, 2012

Now that the hubub over Rob Ford is dying down Toronto needs to start thinking about what happens next. Rob mentions he will fight the ruling “tooth and nail”.

He has also mentioned he will try to run in a by-election, although the city lawyer believes he may not be eligible until 2014.

If there was a by-election in a month two potential front runners would be Adam Vaughan and Olivia chow.

Adam Vaughan is the councillor for Ward 20 Trinity-Spadina and has been involved in politics for about 20 years. The best clip I have seen of Adam and his particular brand of politics is in this clip of him discussing privatization with KPMG after Toronto looked at the privatization of TTC streetcars

His biggest opponent and coincidentally his predecessor for Ward 20 councillor is Olivia Chow, wife of the late Jack Layton leader of the NDP. Olivia is currently the MP for the Trinity-Spadina area. She has lots of experience in Toronto politics. Here is a clip of her speaking out for equal marriage (love the fact Jack is sitting in front of her).

Toronto needs to pick itself up, dust itself off, and try to make up those lost two years when Rob Ford was our mayor. We need to learn from the mistake of putting too much stock in the sound clip “gravy train!” and realize that respect for tax payers should not come at the cost of self respect.

Toronto needs to elect a mayor who loves Toronto. Who loves ALL of Toronto not just parts of it; loves Chinatown, and little Italy, loves Danforth and the Beach, loves Markham and Scarborough. We need a mayor who appreciates the suburbs and the urban areas and wants to see Toronto move forward towards the unique city it is and can become.

Share

Na na na na, hey hey hey good-bye!

Monday, November 26th, 2012

I thought this going away song would be appropriate for Rob Ford and something he can relate to:

Perhaps it is a little bit of schadenfreude but I am over-joyed the judge has ruled against Rob Ford and removed him from office. Anyone who compares Chinese Canadians to dogs, drives while reading, drives while drunk, lies to the press about drunken outbursts, compares cycling to swimming with sharks, claims you wouldn’t get AIDs unless you are a junkie or gay, and places coaching football above the interests of the largest city in the country has no business being mayor.

Hit the bricks Rob, and take your brother with you.

Share

Your dog is not a child!

Wednesday, November 7th, 2012

The Toronto Star posted an article about whether or not dogs should be allowed to run free in the city’s parks. Personally, I think dogs should have their own run parks, but any dogs off-leash elsewhere should result in a fine. While I am not a dog person, I can appreciate the companionship and company dogs provide. And there is a certain joy dogs have while running that can only be compared to children playing.

But they are not children, they are domesticated wolves. Have you ever looked at a dog’s form? It has evolved to be a hunter, the mouth takes up a large proportion of it’s head. The pointy teeth in your mouth are called “canines” after the dogs pointy teeth. Many people will point out that their dog has never hurt anyone, that it is calm and well behaved. I will point out this woman’s dog ate her face.

But even without the potential for violence, dogs make a mess. Some dog owners don’t pick up after their pets, and no one wants to step in shit. Worse, I have seen people let their dogs shit in playgrounds. I have seen people with their dogs loose running around a school ground. I’m not a parent, but one doesn’t need to be to realize kids playing in shit is not a good idea. There is a frightening list of diseases humans can get from dogs. No one should be endangered or risk diseases because someone else is lazy.

Dogs need to run; they need exercise otherwise they end up like this:.

Can we not allocate space in parks and fence it in like they did in Allan Gardens Park so that dogs have a space and people stay safe?

Share

No Casino in Toronto thanks

Wednesday, October 31st, 2012

Every time I read about the city getting a casino I cringe. First off, let’s be clear: I don’t like gambling. Gambling is nothing more than a way of taking advantage of people who cannot do math. I would recommend the book “Struck by Lightning” by U of T professor Jeffery Rosenthal for a better idea of what I am taking about. It answer questions like:Are you more likely to win the jackpot from that slot machine, or catch the flu from the person who used it before you?

I have been to Vegas, and I have gambled in casinos before and what strikes me most about them is the façade of excitement and joy. Rob Ford and his supporters are pushing the idea of a casino as a way of invigorating the city and adding much needed revenue to the city coffers, as well as adding jobs. The truth however is much bleaker. When I was in vegas I saw people sitting at slot machines when I went out in the morning from our hotel to go to the Grand Canyon who were still there when we got back 12 hours later. Same clothes, same machine. The law of large numbers states simply that if you play long enough, the casino will take your money.

And let’s be clear, the city will not own the casino. The government may tax the casino, but we all know corporations of ways of avoiding taxes. Someone, presumable a private investor or investors who will be reaping the rewards of human misery. Don’t forget Vegas was founded by criminals looking to launder money, the fact the government takes advantage of it doesn’t make it any less seedy. There are talks of expanding the Woodbine race track, which if you live in the Beach you’re probably not keen on. There are numerous studies that show the impact of casinos on the local communities There are hundreds more if you just search.

But rather than just be a naysayer I have a simple solution if the city wanted to make money from the public. Sell Toronto Savings bonds. Offer 5% interest or a chance to win half the interest of everyone who chooses to gamble. For example if you buy a hundred dollar bond, you could cash it in for $105 in a year. Or people could choose to forgo the $5 to earn a chance to win half the interest of everyone who participates. They still get the hundred dollars back, so they don’t lose anything, but by rolling the dice (pun intended) they get a chance to win. If 100 people participate that is (100 x $5)/2 or $250 dollars as more people participate the bigger the jackpot is.

Before you ask, yes I am aware that this is gambling and I am sure there are laws around why we can’t do this but it seems like a simple way to get city the money it needs to operate, allow people to participate without huge risk, and offer the opportunity of a payout. This isn’t the first time someone had this idea, and it is not without it’s opponents, but I think it’s still preferable to a brick and mortar casino downtown.

Share

Pride funding in jeopardy…again

Wednesday, May 23rd, 2012

The city of Toronto is again threatening the funding of pride if the Queers Against Israeli Apartheid marches.  Councillor James Pasternak likens the group to bullies, ”I think I’m looking for some leadership from Pride to finally say ‘No’ to this kind of bullying and demonization. We don’t pull funding just for the fun of it. If Pride feels that supporting QuAIA is more important than a cultural grant then that’s their decision.”

The group’s participation put the $100,000+ funding in jeopardy.  This is of course a red herring.  City Hall doesn’t give a shit about gays and would happily pull funding for the fun of it if there wouldn’t be a massive back-lash.

Please don’t think I’m an anti-Semite, or even anti-Israel.  I just think the city should stay out of it rather than getting involved in a very, very complicated situation.

By fighting against the QuAIA, the city is basically throwing it’s hat in the Jewish corner.  We all know how strong the Jewish lobby is; it makes the “gay agenda” look like a kid’s tea party.  The city has no business siding with one group or the other as long as no laws are broken.

Using gay Pride as the lightning rod allows City Hall to smack the gays while supporting their friends and all the while  ignoring the fact that Pride brings million of dollars into the city.  A benefit the city reaps, not the gay community.

Not to mention the fact that Pro-Isreali groups are in the march as well.  And so they should be!  Pride should be about freedom of speech and being proud of who you are.  Being pro-Jewish doesn’t make one Anti-Palestinian.  And speaking out against Israeli Apartheid, real or imagined, is not the same as speaking out against Israelis.  The city manager agreed that the phrase “Israeli Apartheid” does not violate the city’s anti-discrimination policy, so really the city has no business getting involved.

The  Jewish Defence League protested at Pride offices, which apparently degenerated into name calling and anti-gay slurs.  What are clearly signs of hate speech, likening Palestine to a plague, (ironically the same language used against Jews) and yet there is no protest from city hall, no outcry.  Why not?

The JDL’s facebook page also posted, “During the Nazi Era, many high-ranking Nazis were gay.” Which is clearly a stupid analogy.

Xtra, the queer newspaper reported: “That statement is ‘inane, meaningless and nonsense,’ says Canadian Jewish Congress CEO Bernie Farber. ‘Is the JDL trying to suggest that gays and lesbians are Nazis?’…’They shouldn’t be protesting Pride Toronto, anyway,” says Farber. “They should be protesting QuAIA.’”

Gay pride is about protests.  It started as a march through the streets of New York to protest the unfair treatment of gay men by police at the Stonewall Inn in 1969. And if it wasn’t for those drag queens and rent-boys taking a stand, we wouldn’t have a gay-rights movement and same-sex marriage today.

Toronto held its first Pride three years later in 1972. We now mark the infamous Stonewall Riots every summer with a parade through town. If you don’t like a groups politics, then just ignore them.

Share

Cycling in the City

Friday, May 4th, 2012

I have been off the commuter for the past couple of weeks.  The need to dress up plus fighting a cold has kept me from pedalling to work.  However I do ride at least 3 times a week around the city and I am a huge proponent of cycling.   I came across this cool map on Openfile. It allows you to plot a ride and it will tell you which intersections and areas are accident prone.  For my commute it seems the intersection of Leslie and Lakeshore is the death  trap. You can also click on the number and see those 11 accidents.

 

A very nifty tool.  Also, the Toronto police have a survey asking about cycling safety habits. https://secure.torontopolice.on.ca/survey/public/survey.php?name=cpn0097_copy  But given the generic nature of the questions I am not sure what they are actually hoping to glean from it.

 

 

Share

Good Lord, I agree with Ford

Thursday, March 22nd, 2012

What is wrong with me, I agree with Rob Ford. Toronto needs subways.

Now before you go all crazy think about this. We should be building for 2050, not 2015. I know it seems like a long time from now but in reality it isn’t.  It is our grandchildren’s time and personally I hope to be alive to see it.

The goal to get subways isn’t to get cars off the road. (Rob was very wrong on that one) That is going to happen anyway as the cost of ownership and gasoline climb. The goal of subways is to move as many people as possible efficiently. Subways are more efficient than street-cars; but the inverse problem is true too. Without riders, they’re more wasteful.

People are against subways because they are so costly, especially when they don’t know where the money is coming from.  They know the current subways are not fully utilized, for example the Sheppard Subway. Sheppard wastes 7 million dollars a year. The issue isn’t the cost, it’s the lack of riders. If it was fully utilized then no one would be complaining. So, how do you increase ridership?

First, you change zoning. All along Sheppard avenue should be rezoned as high density housing. They are condos there now, around the Ikea, but when the subway was finished years before there was nothing. Development was finish and people can start moving in but it has been awhile. By changing the zoning, not only will there be more riders, but more tax revenue.  I own a condo and a house and pay similar taxes on both. The same plot of land under my condo condo generates taxes dollars from me, my neighbours and the hundred of other units in the building. The land under my house only generates taxes from me.

Developers should be encouraged to build 20,30 40 story buildings. That can lead to gentrification like in the Liberty village area, but that can be offset with bylaws stating the amount of green and commercial space required. People are going to have to start living closer to were they work and start use public transit. By rezoning to high density we will be building subways to where the people are, not building the subway and hoping people will come.

Rob Ford’s problem is his brother and others who give him advice.  You cannot bully people into doing what you want and now that the council has shown they can and will stand together you have to convince.  If Rob had shown that the subways could be paid for by tolls on the DVP and 401, a modest increase in property tax and a vehicle registration tax people might have gone for it.  If he had shown thought leadership and done his homework as opposed to yelling about how “they don’t want these damn streetcars.” He might have gotten his way.  Subways are more efficient, and in the long run the better choice it was just poorly articulated.

As it stands I will continue to ride my bike to work. I live close enough that the commute is easy. But if I couldn’t ride I would take the subway over any other transit option including owning a car.  While I rarely agree with the Mayor I think he with this one.  Toronto needs subways.  It’s just a shame he was unable to articulate it.

Share

Moving towards a better tomorrow?

Monday, February 6th, 2012

You know what I hate?  A lot of things, but one thing I really hate is when someone thinks I’m stupid and they can pull a fast one on me.  Like I will blindly accept whatever they say and just agree. Take this bull shit ad from the TTC.

In case you can’t read it,

Better transit runs on better funding.

  • Fares don’t cover the cost of every trip, so as ridership grows the TTC’s costs grow.
  • The TTC gets less financial help than any other major North American transit system – only $0.84 per customer from Toronto property taxpayers.
  • Montreal gets $1.28 per customer from city and provincial governments
  • Chicago gets $2.64 per customer from local state and federal governments
  • More help from provincial and federal governments will allow the TTC to meet Toronto’s growing transit needs.

First off as the ridership grows the costs may grow but not at the same rate.  A streetcar travelling along Queen street costs the same to operate whether there is one person on it or a hundred.  You still have to pay the driver, pay for gas, pay for rails. The only difference is that an increase in stopping and starting might be less fuel efficient.  But on a busy route like Queen, chances are the streetcar will stop at every stop anyway.

Secondly, the ad is comparing one level of funding (Toronto) against two (Ottawa) and three (Chicago) levels of funding which is misleading.  While the Harris government left Ontario reeling, and it’s still recovering, the TTC has been wholly supported by the people of Toronto.  Both in terms of fares and in terms of municipal taxes, that is the real issue here.

Lastly who gives a flying-fuck about Chicago.  We’re not American, and it’s not like their governments are shining beacons of good decisions, let’s focus on Canada.

Now, the TTC is considered one of the most costly transit systems in Canada. For the 2011 operating year, the TTC had a projected operating budget of $1,447 million dollars. Revenue from fares covered approximately 70% of the budget, whereas the remaining 30% originated from the city. (from Wikipedia)  If they wanted to get Torontonians riled up then what they need to do is quit pussy-footing around the issue and drive the point home:

Better transit runs on better funding.

  • Fares don’t cover the cost of every trip, Toronto property taxes account for 30% of the funding.  40% of TTC riders are not Toronto taxpayers.
  • Montreal transit gets 10% of it’s operating budget from the provincial government.
  • Ottawa receives 9% of it’s funding from the Ontario government.
  • Brampton, Durham, Oakville, St. Catherines, Thunder Bay, Wasaga Beach, Waterloo all receive millions of dollars for their transit, why not Toronto?
  • Contact Bob Chiarelli, the Minister of Transportation bchiarelli.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org

With an ad like that you would get people’s attention, and provide them with a source of action. Someone to contact to complain.  At the very least Toronto should have a fare system which includes zones so all riders pay their fair share regardless of whether or not it is through fares or taxes.

Share

Another Butcher’s update

Saturday, January 28th, 2012

It’s been a year or so since this whole Butcher’s fiasco started.  I was one of the lucky ones, getting my money back.  It was probably because I work for the CBC (which I made a point of mentioning) and CBC had already done an expose on the whole online-coupon thing and interviewed Marlon at the Butchers as well.

The Butchers is gone, and has been replaced by Marlon’s meats. And the website states in it’s FAQ section that they will honor coupons until Labor Day weekend 2012.  They are asking voucher holders to submit their vouchers to buytopia and other web coupon site who will “schedule it and arrange collection or delivery”

Needless to say Buytopia and the like are not going to do that.  They are not in the product scheduling and delivery business and I am sure their lawyers will argue that it is Marlon’s responsibility to honor the agreements.

Several commentors on the blog have mentioned that the vouchers are no longer being honored and apparently legal action has begun.

If you are a voucher holder I would recommend you try to get other people together and place a class action suit against the parties involved. There is a lot of money on the table and if Buytopia or the Butcher’s win, they are going to walk away with it.  Minus whatever the lawyers take and I don’t think anyone bought coupons to pay lawyers.

 

Share