marketing

Well Done Tiger

Friday, September 10th, 2010

I have written a few times about email marketing.

THE NEWEST IN EMAIL FAIL…AIR CANADA!

THOUGHTS ON EMAIL MARKETING

MORE THINKING OF EMAIL

I am by no means an expert, but I know what I hate and I don’t hate this.  Tiger direct sends me mail everyday which I don’t mind it because with a glance I can see whether or not it is to my taste.  They advertise computer and computer components which are relevant to my interests.  But check this out:

They know I left my cart and are reminding me about it. They provide a time limit to give a sense of urgency. They give me a direct link to see my cart and a code with which to provide an agent should I wish to perform this purchase on the phone.  Brilliant.  Just brilliant.

I would love to see what the conversion rate is on this;  I bet they make a mint off of it.  This is the sort of sensible, well thought out marketing emails that I want to receive.  Well done Tiger Direct!

Share

The newest in email FAIL…Air Canada!

Wednesday, February 10th, 2010

Check out this email I received today in my inbox:

There’s nothing wrong with it right? They have it personalized, there are very clear offers, they might be relevant except… I just bought a fucking ticket to Tokyo.

Sending me a cheap offer three days later is like telling customers, “Gee, you should have been here last week when we had everything 80% off.” It doesn’t make me feel good. I can’t change my ticket and now I feel resentful and cheated by the price I paid.

Unless you’re planning on honoring it and giving me the discount don’t tell me about it!

Share

Thoughts on email marketing

Thursday, January 14th, 2010

holtrefrewfailEvery so often I feel stabby… okay fairly often. But one of the things that makes me most stabby is bad junk email. Advertisers seem to think they still live in the age of television. That they must pump a message out to as many people as possible and that the message must be the same. If find this extremely frustrating given the vastness of data available at our fingertips.

For example this showed up in my inbox today.

While the woman is attractive (and the $280 shirts arguable). I am neither a woman, straight, nor an Yves Saint Laurent shopper. While I have shopped at Holt Renfrew, provided them with my personal details and handed over my email address I have done so with the expectation of some customization in the email.

You may recall, dear reader, my previous posting on this topic. Holt Renfrew has tripped on the same hurdle that Shoppers Drug Mart did. At least they didn’t pretend to customize the email instead they just blasted it without regard to everyone on the list. Since the email is of no relevance or interest to me it was deleted. If Holt Renfrew does this too often I will simply remove myself from the list.

The shame is that email is very cheap, so little or no thought is given to blasting out this sort of advertising. If it cost them $3 per email I bet they would be a lot more selective about who gets it. There would also be a follow up strategy for those people who respond. The data is available to make marketing emails meaningful and so each customer could receive an offer that targets them.

chapters

Now compare this email to the one that was sent by Chapter/Indigo. This email is also un-targeted. However, rather than make an offer I am not interested in, they simply inform me that they are having a sale.

In this case, while not something I am interested in per se, it might be about something I am interested in. By keeping the email simply about a sale Chapters/Indigo hits the massive market they are after. However, if it is too vague, and vague too often, then I will unsubscribe from this as well.

It is a shotgun approach to marketing.

Amazon gets a little better at this, but there is no follow up or modification of the targeting. They clearly appreciate the value of data and customization. Amazon sends me emails based on the types of books I have purchased before, however that still segments me into a group even if I don’t respond.

I get an email for business type books, I get another one for gay books, I get another one for music, I get another one for fiction all because I have purchased one of each of these books on Amazon at sometime in my life.

The problem is the system seems to be is stupid. Just because I have purchased a baby book on Amazon in the past, doesn’t mean I have a baby or want additional baby books. If I don’t respond to the twenty other offers you have sent then don’t send it again because it was probably a one-time thing.

I know the data is out there, I know the development can be done, now we just need someone to put it all together and rock the market with some kick-ass, relevant marketing.

Share

Myth of the iphone app

Thursday, June 4th, 2009

There is this idea that if you can build an iPhone app you can ride the next dot-com type wave to millions of dollars. Take the guy who made the iPhone app that tells you you’re rich and lets you know if anyone else with the same app is nearby. He sold 8 copies for $999 each. Now granted that is only around $8000, but for a picture of a gem that lights up, it’s pretty ridiculous money.

The problem as I see it is that just like Facebook, Twitter and mySpace marketers and their clients are jumping into the fray without any thought as to “should I really be here?” Before a company invests considerable time and money in developing an iPhone app they should consider that the usage rate drops considerably after the app is first downloaded. 

This is because most apps suck.

They suck because marketers and developers have not considered the audience, the iPhone usage and whether or not they even belong in that space.  I know from my own iPhone usage I have downloaded about 40 apps and use 5 on a consistent basis. I use each one in a different fashion, for different reasons and at different times. 

For example I use a little app called Majong fairyland twice a day on the subway, once on the way to work and once one the way home.  The average game lasts 45-50 minutes which is perfect for my commute.  The game is complex enough to occupy my mind, but allows me to listen to my own music or audio book so I can multi-task while playing.

Another great app I use is Run Keeper which I have blogged about before. In both these instances the app is useful and appropriate for the audience. But they are only used in very specific instances.  Something like a news app would be useless to me since the only time I have time to read is on the subway, which has no Wifi connection, meaning I cannot read updated news  – ergo useless. When I get home I could the iPhone app but I’d rather just turn on the TV.

Now I realize that not everyone takes the subway but what other conditions should developers be thinking about?  Say, you drive to work.  Gotta keep your eyes on the road, can’t be looking at an iPhone (or at least you shouldn’t be) so what to do?  How about an iPhone app that reads the news aloud?  It could allow users to select via RSS the types of stories they want. Then it would be like having your own customized news broadcast.

Another group who should be on the iPhone is MLS.  Imagine walking with your spouse along a street lined with trees in a neighbourhood you both like and you think, “Gee, We should move into this area.”  With an iPhone app it could use GPS to identify your location and show a Google map (which MLS are already using) and display the homes for sale in that area.  Then you could change the settings, filter the results and walk over to the houses in the area that your are interested in!

untitled2

Now there are reasons why this app won’t work, MLS has a strangle hold on the data, for example.  But the idea is solid, realtors (especially selling realtors) would love it, and it has a defined use.  To make an app successful developers, marketers and companies need to look past the “buzz” and the quick money and consider “would I actually use this?”

Share