television

CBC Cuts

Wednesday, April 4th, 2012

The CBC has just received another 115 million dollar budget cut in the latest federal government budget. Faced with this significant shortfall in funding the CBC is now in a position where it has to trim another 650 jobs.

I think former CBC president Robert Rabinovitch put it best, “This is a death by a thousand cuts. At what point does the CBC become totally irrelevant? A back door way of destroying public broadcasting.”

The conservative party doesn’t want to be seen axing the CBC so they chip away at it slowly. It is interesting to watch the public reaction because it is very mixed.   Some people cite the CBC’s “liberal bias” as their reason for rejection, while others feel that makes it worth saving. Funny thing is, I think if you counted the number of Conservative articles and the number of Liberal articles they are probably even. Some people want to gut it, and others think it is a notional treasure.

Love it or hate it, the truth about the CBC probably lies somewhere in between.

The Toronto star has even built an entire website to the CBC. However, the message from it is very mixed just like the response from the public.  On one hand they have a page that notes the CBC receives less funding than public broadcast in other countries (Italy, Australia, Japan, Ireland, France, Belgium, Spain, Austria, Sweden, U.K., Finland, Denmark, Germany, Switzerland and Norway) but a little more than New Zealand and U.S.  They also note that  86% of Canadians say they regularly watch CBC, 42% regularly listen to CBC radio and 40% visit the website.  Which would seem they are in favour of Mother Corp.

Yet in the same  breath Torstar has confusingly hired Kai Nagata to mimic Rick Mercer’s style in a segment called “Canadian Broadcasting Consultancy” where he basically attempts to poke fun at the CBC with titles “CBC, meet the internet” completely ignoring the fact the CBC has been on the internet for over 15 years, has millions of pages, thousands of audio and video streams and hundreds of micro-sites, instead focusing on trying to find a single clip from the National in the archives from 1993.

First he is upset he needs a plugin to view it on the archives site, and then, unable to play it he looks in the internal search, where he gets exasperated and finally goes over to Youtube as if to show how poorly CBC does it’s job. However if he had simply searched “peter mansbridge internet in 1993″ in Google, like everyone else on the planet, it was the first result.  I would like to provide Mr. Nagata with a little education of his own.

Or Another webisode entitled “Keep it Cool”, about how the CBC should be open with it’s information about how it spends the funding.   What is lost on some people, is that Torstar wants to use this information as a commercial and tactical business advantage, not because they really care about how the money is being spent.

For example, Mr. Nagata specifically mentions Peter Mansbridge’s salary. Explain to me why anyone would need to know how much Peter Mansbridge is getting paid.  It might not be a matter of National security, but that is Mr. Mansbridge’s personal information and I think he has the right to his privacy like everyone else.  They could say they spend a certain amount making the National, or this is what is spent on programming but what Peter Mansbridge actually get’s paid is nobody’s business.  It doesn’t affect the CBC’s budget, it doesn’t affect how they program their shows and it doesn’t affect how much we pay in taxes.

As an tangential observation I noticed that in the videos Kai Nagata is wearing the same clothes in every segment.  I realized that he just set a camera up on a rooftop and filmed all the clips on a single day, I feel a little cheated by that, it makes it seem cheap for some reason.  A good producer would have had him change shirts to at least maintain the illusion they were making an effort. Instead they come off as short, pointless rants from a bitter ex-employee.

Speaking of former employees, the Toronto Star also provides a friendly plug to Richard Stursberg, former VP of English services and his new book.  Stursberg did try to shake things up, I will give him that, but there is no shortage of people bitter with the CBC, or former employees who can point out what is wrong with the place. They even have their own website, the tea makers, although it seems all but abandoned now. The website name comes from a Clash song, but for some reason it seems properly Canadian to me.

Who knows, one day I might even join them. But rather than looking at what is wrong with the CBC, (and there is no shortage of those) I try to look at what is right with it.

1) CBC is Canadian television.  Look at the programming on CBC: 22 minutes, Arctic Air, Canada’s Smartest Person, Hockey Night in Canada, Heartland… the list goes on.  Look at the programming on CTV: Hot in Cleveland, American Idol, CSI New York… One is Canadian Television, the other is American Television in Canada.

2) CBC Radio.  CBC radio is extremely important in the rural areas.  It helps connect those communities with the major centres both culturally and in terms of current events.  Many times when I was tree-planting the only station that was available was CBC, and let me tell you it was a God-send.

3) CBC Kids programming.  I don’t know anyone my age who doesn’t get a little misty eyed when talking about how much they love Mr. Dressup and the Friendly Giant.  While the kids programming has changed it still evokes that strong sense of attachment.

4) CBC people.  Some people are devoted CBCers.  They drank the kool-aid, and I envy them for it.  You will find people at the corp who have been there for 25+ years, worked in a variety of roles in almost every department. People who remember when CBC.ca first launched, when the first digital stream went out, when vinyl was retired.  I even think there might be some who remember when the Leafs won a cup. You don’t get that kind of devotion unless you have a pretty compelling mission.

CBC is worth protecting, and funding.  In my humble opinion, if we want to make it better, do away with advertising all together fund it completely. Get rid of the ads, and focus on top quality content. Don’t try to do everything for everyone, make the tough content choices that help bind the country together.

CBC radio and television is at it’s best when it is bringing culturally relevant programming to Canadians. It may not be the most marketable, or the most popular, but that is not what the CBC should be.  It should never pander to the lowest common denominator.

 

Share

It’s always prime time

Tuesday, March 24th, 2009

A co-worker Mark and I were discussing the changes going on in the various media industries of late.  First the recording industry is taking a thrashing with groups like Radiohead and Nine Inch Nails releasing albums online and giving the record labels pinks slips.  They, the recording industry, are now attempting to force new artists to sign 360 degree contracts which would give them a cut of all profits.  This is eerily similar to what the UFC has done to fighters forcing them to sign away exclusive rights to their own likenesses.

Now the newspaper industry is collapsing upon itself.  There is even a wonderful little website newspaperdeathwatch.com.  Now I don’t know if blogging is to blame or the internet or what.  But what I do know is that the only consistent thing in life is change.  I am sure there was a time when they thought that they were indestructable just like the Big 3 and the banks.

There is another change coming, and there are already whiffs of it in the wind.   The Canadian government is ready to help struggling broadcasters.  However, they have not stopped to consider why they are struggling.  Media broadcasting is dying out.  Not only are the advertisers disappearing in this declining market, but new and more effective forms of advertising are popping up. Also in this day and age I can stream every television show I want to watch, and skip every commercial!

Everything changes. The questions become by how much and what is the impact?

We need to change the way we do business.   We need a MEGA-change in how we think about information, how we consume it, how we distribute it how, how we maintain ownership of it.  No more geo-fencing, no more limiting who can see what where and when.  Everyone can create content now.  You don’t need expensive camera or big studios. 

While television might not be ready to go the way of the dodo just yet anyone who thinks broadcasting signals is the way to go had better think again. 

The advertising opportunities with streaming media is mind-boggling.  No longer would you need to consider the lead-in shows or the bridge shows.  Advertisers will be able to target their video commercials with laser precision. Find the show with your exact demographics and BAM!   For example I like Family Guy, it appeals to me and other 20-40 something white males.  If that is your demographic you tie your ads to the show then the info (and your ad) is deliverable to me 24 hours a day.  No more wasted commercials during prime time because you know what?

It’s always prime time on the internet!

Share

Epicurius might be right

Tuesday, November 25th, 2008

I am currently watching some documentaries on philosophy and in particular with happiness.

Epicusius felt that happiness came from the simple things in life, and that as Biggie pointed out, the”mo’ money we come across the mo’ problems we see.” He set up a home in the outskirts of the city, bought a huge house and invited his friends to live with him. He felt that one should never eat alone. I agree.

He went further to lay much of the blame for society’s ills at the feet of advertising. Advertising takes our desires and perverts them into a desire for things.  For example:

What we want isn’t the beer, or the cigarettes; although sometimes we may want those things.  What the ads are playing on is our desire for adventure, or need to be with friends.   There are also deeper desires being played upon.  The man in the cigarette ad represents our need to be capable; he is fixing a plane in the middle of the savanna while looking as though he his calm and relaxed.    The beer ad plays upon the heterosexual male fantasy of a menage-a-trois with two beautiful women.

As people need to curb their spending with the oncoming recession, they may turn to family and friends for support.  As for myself, I plan on turning down my spending and entertaining more at home rather than going out.  The advertising will have less of an impact as I will have start to ignoring it, knowing that I can’t afford these things anyway.

As a result, in this time of economic downturn I think we may paradoxically come out the other end of it happier than when we went in.

Share

Cashing in on misery

Tuesday, October 21st, 2008

So the folks that brought you Survivor are going to be creating a new show, Live like you’re dying“. It will feature someone who is terminally ill and follow them on the trip of a life time.  Which will include reunions with feuding family members and former friends. Think Make a Wish meets Big Brother.

While they insist the show will be inspirational rather than depressing and morbid, one can’t help but question how far they will take it. Will they follow some poor bastard through their last rattling breaths while they shit themselves waiting for the grim spectre of death to finally provide them with some relief? Let’s hope so!

It reminds me of the Dutch T.V. show “De Grote Donorshow” or “The Big Donor Show” where contestants compete to win a kidney, or liver or some other organ they desperately need.  While the show was a hoax and supposed to raise organ donation awareness, this Live like you’re dying idea is not far off.

I’m all for “make a wish” and carpe diem but I really don’t need to watch someone reunite with estranged family members just because they are dying.  If people spent time and effort on their own lives they wouldn’t need to watch the misery and drama in other’s.

Share

Greed and shame

Tuesday, June 10th, 2008

So the CBC lost the use of the theme for “Hockey Night in Canada” and while no one else will say it I will, shame on Dolores Claman. 

That’s right, shame.  CBC paid for that song many times over.  She received royalties every time it played and after negotiations broke down, went and sold it to CTV.  CBC had reportedly offered a million dollars for it and considering they had already paid her millions for its use, I would say they more than ponied up.  CTV of course is changing the name of the song to “The Hockey Song”  but everyone knows what it really is, “Hockey Night in Canada.”

I think what this shows is the systematic greed in the music industry.  By all means pay artists for their work, and pay them well.  But only pay them once.

Dolores Claman had an opportunity to become a national hero,if she had sold it for a million.  Or probably would have received the Order of Canada if she had donated it to the national archives.  Instead she went for greed.  What a shame.

Share